STLPR0%

After closing in 2024, St. Louis club BB’s Jazz, Blues & Soups rehearses for a revival 15%

By Jeremy D. Goodwin0%

5/21/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Indoctrination, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 804 faulty-reasoning hits from 564 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (17,523 of 20,472 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the article peer group.

St. 
Louis bluesman Marquise Knox stood center stage at BB’s Jazz, Blues and Soups, tightly gripping a microphone as he belted out the words to a soul classic that vocalist James Carr made famous in 1966. 
“Won’t you show a little mercy? 
Can’t you understand? 
You’re pouring water on a drowning man,” Knox sang, as members of an appreciative crowd  filling much of the space in the 300-capacity club on Wednesday afternoon  hooted their approval. 
It’s the sort of sight that was once common at this venue, but hasn’t recurred since the club closed its doors in 2024, seemingly for good. 
Steve Sullivan and Mark Goldenberg, who bought BB’s neighbor Broadway Oyster Bar in 2019, now have the blues club under contract to buy. 
“Let me make a few promises to you. 
We are going to be good stewards of this place,” Sullivan said from the stage during the preview event. 
“Music is the soul of St. 
Louis, every bit as much as the Arch, as much as the St. 
Louis Cardinals. 
Maybe even as much as gooey butter cake. 
So we’re not going to lose this heritage.” 
The target reopening date for the venue is Sept. 
1, Sullivan said, and it will open four days a week. 
A gospel brunch is planned for Sundays. 
The menu will be inspired by cuisine of the South. 
Beyond finalizing the sale, another key task remains for the prospective new owners: securing a liquor license. 
Knox will book the performers at the newly revived BB’s. 
He also plans to run music education programs from the space. 
“Blues artists deserve a blues club. 
And we view BBs not only as a club. 
It's an institution for St. 
Louis blues,” Knox said, “and our goal going forward is to make sure that we are teaching the young kids about the blues. 
We want to make sure that our young Black babies also know that this is their heritage. 
This is their culture, and they should be proud of it. 
And they can always come down here to experience it and learn it.” 
There’s some historical symmetry in Sullivan and Goldenberg’s move to take over the club. 
BB’s co-founder Bob Burkhardt opened Broadway Oyster Bar in 1978. 
Burkhard and Mark O’Shaughnessy had opened BB’s two years earlier, but the club went through two cycles of opening, closing and sitting dormant before the enterprise caught a third wind in 1996. 
It reopened that year after a 15-year gap and became a supporting pillar of the local blues community. 
After starting out as a bartender there, John May worked his way up to managing partner and part owner of BB’s Jazz, Blues & Soups before retiring at the end of 2023. 
Standing on the front sidewalk on Wednesday, after his first taste of live music there in years, May said the landmark is in good hands. 
“The goal was that if we were going to sell it, hopefully it would be to somebody who would respect the legacy. 
Steve and the Oyster Bar are invested in this area, and they respect the city and the music, and they respect the legacy of BB’s and wanted to carry it on. 
That was perfect, because if it isn't going to be us, let it be them.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.3%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 2.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.5%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 8.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 4.1%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion4.1%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 6.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 4.6%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 6.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 4.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias8.9%This article: 5.5%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error5.5%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 3.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect9.8%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.5%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority5.5%This article: 2.7%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma2.7%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 3.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 22.2%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 3.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion22.2%This article: 5.5%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question5.5%This article: 2.5%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.9%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.9%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.1%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal10.1%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.6%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.6%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.4%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice3.4%This article: 10.1%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination10.1%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeremy D. Goodwin: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

564 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers52%attributed speech271writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Sullivan • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Sullivan • 19 words • 100.0% coverageSteve Sullivan • 6 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Sullivan • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Sullivan • 2 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Sullivan • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Sullivan • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Sullivan • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 6 words • 100.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 23 words • 100.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 17 words • 100.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 11 words • 100.0% coverageMarquise Knox • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJohn May • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJohn May • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJohn May • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJohn May • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

John May

100%flagged-word coverage
93 attributed words32% of attributed speech33% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.