Keyword summary
46%2 analyzed articles/videos564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blues results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 1,022 hits. Analysis detected 3,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,122 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,305 of 37,536 keywords). This Blues is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Blues
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
52%Blues (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,122
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 24.8%24.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos