Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Broadway Oyster Bar results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 1,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (22,892 of 35,445 keywords). This Broadway Oyster Bar is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Broadway Oyster Bar
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠36%Broadway Oyster Bar (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos