BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 940 faulty-reasoning hits from 614 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,071 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the article peer group.

WESTERLY, R.I. 
(AP)  When a large tent appeared next door to Taylor Swift’s Watch Hill estate this week, it didn’t take long for speculation about the superstar’s impending nuptials to ripple through the affluent New England seaside village  and the internet. 
Soon, fans were swapping theories online, photographers were staking out vantage points and residents found themselves fielding questions about a wedding that never was. 
Or at least, a wedding that seems yet to happen. 
The rumors, so far, have proved unfounded. 
But they offered a glimpse into life in Watch Hill, the Rhode Island beach community in the town of Westerly, close to the Connecticut border, where Swift has owned a home for more than a decade and where curiosity about the singer has become woven into everyday life. 
She watched visitors speculate about a wedding she said she knew wasn’t Swift’s. 
She’s working a different wedding every weekend in June in that spot. 
Still, the questions kept coming. 
“Is Taylor Swift getting married here? 
Many, many, many have asked,” Simeral said. 
She said there had been “a lot of chitter chatter” as people tried to connect sightings of people who know Swift in local shops to impending nuptials. 
But she doubted Watch Hill would be practical for a wedding of that scale because of its limited luxury lodging. 
The tent itself, Simeral said, was hardly unusual. 
“Next weekend, there’ll be another tent just like this.” 
For two summers, Westerly Police Department community service officer Nick Quaratella has stood at the entrance to a public path leading to the beach beside Swift’s estate, answering questions from beachgoers and keeping traffic moving. 
“They come to the beach, but then they also ask if she’s here or not,” Quaratella said. 
“And they’ll say, ‘No.’ 
And I say, ‘Yeah, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson moved in.’ 
And they’ll go, ‘Oh, really?’ 
and then they’ll walk away.” 
“That’s pretty funny,” he concluded. 
He said he can’t help but joke around with some fans. 
Quaratella has fielded a few questions about the supposed wedding, but not as many as he expected. 
“At this point, it’s part of my job,” he said. 
“It makes me smile. 
It makes me laugh. 
I have no problem with it. 
It makes the day go by.” 
Living with Taylor Swift 
Down near a strip of beach boutiques, lifelong resident Lauren Nigrelli said the frenzy surrounding the star has eased since Swift first moved into the neighborhood in 2013. 
Back then, Nigrelli recalled, fans would drive around in circles by her shop playing Swift’s songs. 
“Things have definitely calmed down since then,” she said. 
She said she had heard various theories, including speculation that a wedding might be held at Ocean House. 
But as she thought through the logistics, she became skeptical. 
“Then I was thinking about, ‘How would everybody get here?’ 
she said. 
“In New York, you’ve got JFK, you’ve got LaGuardia, and she’s got two penthouses in New York that she combined, so I figured they could obviously have more people there.” 
Her husband wasn’t so sure. 
“They could lie and say it’s happening there, but it’s happening here,” John Curtis said. 
“When important people do things, they don’t want people to know.” 
She said the excitement surrounding Swift helped local businesses and enjoyed visiting the inspiration for “the last great american dynasty,” a song about Holiday House from Swift’s 2020 Grammy Album of the Year-winning album, folklore. 
But she said the speculation at times crosses a line. 
“If she wants to share it, she wants to share it,” she said. 
“At the end of the day, it’s someone’s house.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.3%Leah Willingham: 2.6%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias3.3%This article: 1.3%Leah Willingham: 0.1%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.3%This article: 15.0%Leah Willingham: 3.2%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic15.0%This article: 6.0%Leah Willingham: 0.6%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Leah Willingham: 10.2%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.6%Leah Willingham: 0.5%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Leah Willingham: 0.3%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 2.4%Leah Willingham: 0.2%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.4%This article: 11.4%Leah Willingham: 1.7%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias11.4%This article: 1.8%Leah Willingham: 0.2%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.7%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Leah Willingham: 1.6%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect9.9%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Leah Willingham: 2.1%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.8%Leah Willingham: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.8%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 1.6%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.5%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.2%Leah Willingham: 3.8%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization11.2%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 1.1%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.1%Leah Willingham: 5.3%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion2.1%This article: 2.4%Leah Willingham: 1.9%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 6.2%Leah Willingham: 0.6%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.2%This article: 1.6%Leah Willingham: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque1.6%This article: 1.6%Leah Willingham: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof1.6%This article: 2.4%Leah Willingham: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature2.4%This article: 7.8%Leah Willingham: 0.8%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division7.8%This article: 22.3%Leah Willingham: 2.5%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal22.3%This article: 1.1%Leah Willingham: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman1.1%This article: 5.7%Leah Willingham: 0.6%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.9%Leah Willingham: 0.5%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground4.9%This article: 0.3%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.3%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Leah Willingham: 0.1%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote1.0%This article: 1.0%Leah Willingham: 0.7%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 8.3%Leah Willingham: 1.0%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice8.3%This article: 1.6%Leah Willingham: 1.4%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 2.9%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Willingham: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Leah Willingham: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

614 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers59%attributed speech249writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageSimeral • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSimeral • 27 words • 0.0% coverageSimeral • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSimeral • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSimeral • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWesterly Police Department • 35 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 17 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 4 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 10 words • 100.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 5 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 5 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 5 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 4 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 4 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 6 words • 0.0% coverageNick Quaratella • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 9 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Curtis • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Curtis • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 35 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 10 words • 100.0% coverageLauren Nigrelli • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

John Curtis

100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words5.5% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.5 ptsWriter: 16.5%John Curtis: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%John Curtis: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%John Curtis: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%John Curtis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.