Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nicole Simeral results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Nicole Simeral is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nicole Simeral
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Nicole Simeral (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos