Topic summary
0% 32 analyzed articles/videos 17,017 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Swift results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 10,631 hits . Analysis detected 74,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 85,360 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,565 of 16,562 topics). This Taylor Swift is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. Taylor Swift
Topic details
Total words: 85,360
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score32 analyzed articles85.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst