Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,068 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noor Nanji - Culture correspondent results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 376 hits. Analysis detected 2,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,379 of 6,385 authors). This Noor Nanji - Culture correspondent is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Noor Nanji - Culture correspondent
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
48%Noor Nanji - Culture correspondent (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,272
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510047.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos