Keyword summary
63% 10 analyzed articles/videos 7,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Treasury Department results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 2,440 hits . Analysis detected 22,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,840 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,047 of 37,168 keywords). This Treasury Department is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Treasury Department
Keyword details
Total words: 22,840
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles22.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst