Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nora Moriarty results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 2,066 hits . Analysis detected 18,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,468 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,654 of 6,318 authors). This Nora Moriarty is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Nora Moriarty
Author details
Total words: 13,468
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.3% 15.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.8% 8.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst