Scott Bessent says US seized roughly $1B in Iranian crypto as regime nears 'end of their tether' 70%

By Nora Moriarty0%

5/29/2026, 11:06:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 515 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,753 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the article peer group.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the Iranian economy is nearing a breaking point Friday, while announcing that the U.S. has seized roughly $1 billion in Iranian cryptocurrency assets. 
"We have seized about a billion dollars of their crypto," he told FOX Business. 
"Just outright grabbed the wallets." 
Joining "Kudlow" at the Reagan National Economic Forum, Bessent detailed the United States' economic pressure campaign on Iran, known as "Operation Economic Fury," which he said has sent the regime into "crisis." 
"I think between five and a half-six weeks of an incredibly successful military campaign and then Operation Economic Fury, where we have really cut them off…they are at the end of their tether now financially," he said. 
"I think 40 or 50% of the [Iranian] troops aren't getting paid. 
Police aren't reporting to the station. 
Inflation is probably over 200%. 
They're having to give out food vouchers. 
They have turned off the internet." 
The effort, launched in March 2025, has crippled Tehran's financial lifelines by seizing Iranian assets, freezing bank accounts and pressuring foreign governments to cut ties with the nation. 
"We are working with our allies all over Europe to grab villas and houses and properties," Bessent explained. 
"And this is money that's stolen from the Iranian people." 
Bessent said the Iranian regime was siphoning $400 to $500 million every month and dividing the profits amongst dozens of leaders, before the Treasury Department intervened. 
The Treasury secretary went on to address ongoing negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, highlighting the differences between the factions involved in the talks. 
President Donald Trump held a White House meeting Friday where he said he would make a "final determination" on Iran. 
"We did not have regime change, but we changed the regime," Bessent said. 
"The first level leaders were decapitated, the second level decapitated. 
So, we're dealing with the third level." 
"And it's very tough because, on one side, we have a theocracy with the clerics. 
On the other side, we have a thug autocracy with the IRGC. 
And you've got to convince both sides," he added. 
Bessent also spoke about the "very big" mistake Iran made by attacking countries in the Persian Gulf, which he argued left the regime more vulnerable. 
The IRGC has launched drone and missile attacks against all six GCC states. 
"They made my job so much easier because before, many of our great GCC Gulf allies were a little less than transparent about their banking system, that, ‘Oh no, we don't have any Iranian oil,’" Bessent said. 
The Treasury secretary added that after the Iranian strikes, GCC states were more open to disclosing ties to Iranian-supplied oil. 
Bessent also said that young U.S. service members enjoy enforcing the U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz. 
"They've done an incredible job," he told FOX Business. 
"When I talked to General Caine and Secretary Hegseth, they said, ‘Look, these young people aren't afraid. 
They want to fight… This is what they signed up for.’" 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 33.0%Nora Moriarty: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias33.0%This article: 3.9%Nora Moriarty: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias3.9%This article: 3.3%Nora Moriarty: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Nora Moriarty: 8.8%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias3.3%This article: 12.4%Nora Moriarty: 15.3%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect12.4%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.2%Nora Moriarty: 7.6%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias7.2%This article: 7.2%Nora Moriarty: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias7.2%This article: 28.5%Nora Moriarty: 10.3%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias28.5%This article: 7.2%Nora Moriarty: 5.3%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Nora Moriarty: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias6.6%This article: 2.9%Nora Moriarty: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.9%This article: 6.0%Nora Moriarty: 4.4%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Nora Moriarty: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem2.3%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.4%Nora Moriarty: 5.8%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority7.4%This article: 4.7%Nora Moriarty: 1.8%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 1.4%Nora Moriarty: 4.4%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope1.4%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.4%Nora Moriarty: 6.9%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization13.4%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 18.1%Nora Moriarty: 7.6%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion18.1%This article: 4.5%Nora Moriarty: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question4.5%This article: 39.8%Nora Moriarty: 5.4%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)39.8%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.8%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.4%Nora Moriarty: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal6.4%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.5%Nora Moriarty: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.5%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.2%Nora Moriarty: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote12.2%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 2.4%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.7%Nora Moriarty: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice11.7%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 3.2%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

515 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers83%attributed speech85writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Scott Bessent • 17 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 28 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 14 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 5 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 32 words • 100.0% coverageScott Bessent • 37 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 12 words • 100.0% coverageScott Bessent • 6 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 5 words • 100.0% coverageScott Bessent • 7 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageScott Bessent • 18 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 10 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 13 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 10 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 7 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 15 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 12 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 9 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageScott Bessent • 22 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 9 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 17 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Scott Bessent

90%flagged-word coverage
410 attributed words95% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-25.1 ptsWriter: 32.9%Scott Bessent: 7.8%7.8%Unattributed Quote-13.0 ptsWriter: 23.5%Scott Bessent: 10.5%10.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.