Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cryptocurrency Seizure results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 2,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,311 of 16,562 topics). This Cryptocurrency Seizure is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Cryptocurrency Seizure
Topic details
Total words: 2,060
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.0% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.9%11.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos