Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Sanctions results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 877 hits. Analysis detected 5,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,058 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,211 of 16,243 topics). This Iran Sanctions is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Iran Sanctions
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,058
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.6%21.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos