Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Operation Economic Fury results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Overconfidence Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 369 hits . Analysis detected 2,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,240 of 37,536 keywords). This Operation Economic Fury is worse (more manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Operation Economic Fury
Keyword details
Total words: 2,060
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.0% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst