Fox News89%

Kash Patel accuses FBI of lying to obtain warrants used to illegally spy on Trump's 2016 presidential campaign 96%

By Nora Moriarty0%

5/6/2026, 3:00:52 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 621 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.6% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,042 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the article peer group.

FBI Director Kash Patel accused the FBI of lying to obtain surveillance warrants to illegally spy on President Donald Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign and subsequent first term. 
Trump has long accused his 2016 opponent, Hillary Clinton, and former President Barack Obama of being ringleaders in an alleged spying conspiracy against his campaign, an allegation both have denied. 
Patel detailed the yearslong federal investigation into the alleged surveillance on the latest episode of "Hang Out with Sean Hannity." 
"It took me two years of my life to prove the following: that a political party in the United States of America in the 21st century would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake, unverified information, funnel that to not just the intelligence community, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation," he said. 
"And then take those packaged lies that they had paid for with campaign finance funds and go into a secret surveillance court and illegally spy on your opponent to be the president of the United States." 
KASH PATEL SAYS RUSSIAGATE-LINKED FBI ‘BURN BAG’ ROOM WAS MISSING FROM BUREAU BLUEPRINTS 
Patel's comments come as scrutiny intensifies over the federal government’s use of spying power and following Congress’ renewal of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) for 45 days. 
Section 702 of FISA permits authorized U.S. officials to collect phone calls and text messages of foreign targets, but in doing so can also capture Americans’ communications  a piece of legislation Trump strongly opposes. 
Patel told Fox News that FISA warrants  some signed by former FBI Director James Comey  were used to illegally spy on Trump and top officials, including himself, during the 2016 campaign and in years that followed. 
FBI SUBPOENAED KASH PATEL AND SUSIE WILES PHONE RECORDS IN FEDERAL TRUMP INVESTIGATION 
"I was illegally spied on by the likes of Rod Rosenstein (former U.S. deputy attorney general) and Chris Wray (former FBI director) and 10 other staffers on the Hill and people who were elected to serve this country in the halls of Congress." 
"They were actually continuing the weaponization that Donald Trump and I had exposed during Trump One [President Trump's first term]." 
Patel was a member of the National Security Council (NSC) in 2019, becoming deputy assistant to the president and senior director for counterterrorism during Trump's first term. 
He was a chief investigator and primary author of the 2018 "Nunes Memo" alleging FBI bias in Trump-Russia interference investigation. 
The FBI-approved warrants, Patel shared, were later rescinded by the FISA court in 2018 after a federal investigation into the alleged spying was completed. 
PATEL SAYS COMEY CASE IS 'FAR FROM OVER,' VOWS TO RESTORE 'ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY' TO FBI 
"The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal," the FBI director explained. 
"The FBI did not provide evidence of exculpatory evidence and innocence and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications and all the information was unverified." 
"I don't think that's ever happened before... 
Hollywood couldn't come up with this," he added. 
Patel argued that the alleged weaponization of federal law enforcement did not end when Trump first left office in 2021 but was reignited under the Biden administration. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
He also vowed to uncover additional evidence. 
"I knew in the four years that we were out of office, that they continued to regenerate that institution of weaponization," Patel said. 
"So when I walked in the door, I said, ‘We only got a bit of it. 
We only got maybe half of it.’" 
Watch the full interview on YouTube. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 30.4%Nora Moriarty: 6.7%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias30.4%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 3.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 2.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 15.6%Nora Moriarty: 8.8%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias15.6%This article: 5.6%Nora Moriarty: 15.3%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Nora Moriarty: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect9.2%This article: 1.1%Nora Moriarty: 7.6%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 3.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.7%Nora Moriarty: 10.3%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias26.7%This article: 12.7%Nora Moriarty: 5.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Nora Moriarty: 2.1%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Nora Moriarty: 4.4%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Nora Moriarty: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem6.9%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.6%Nora Moriarty: 5.8%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority2.6%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 4.4%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.3%Nora Moriarty: 6.9%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization16.3%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.3%Nora Moriarty: 7.6%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion16.3%This article: 33.0%Nora Moriarty: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question33.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 5.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 2.6%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.8%Nora Moriarty: 2.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection6.8%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 2.8%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nora Moriarty: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Nora Moriarty: 3.2%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.9%This article: 1.3%Nora Moriarty: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.3%

621 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker42%attributed speech362writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 57 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageKash Patel • 43 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageKash Patel • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kash Patel

100%flagged-word coverage
259 attributed words100% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Quote-first Misdirection-11.6 ptsWriter: 11.6%Kash Patel: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Kash Patel: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Kash Patel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.