Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Benincasa results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,379 hits . Analysis detected 7,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,018 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,229 of 6,321 authors). This Robert Benincasa is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Robert Benincasa
Author details
Total words: 6,018
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.6% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 22.9% 22.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.8% 11.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 18.2% 18.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 22.9%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 18.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst