Keyword summary
62%15 analyzed articles/videos8,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Title Ix results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 4,703 hits. Analysis detected 50,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,824 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (27,675 of 34,797 keywords). This Title Ix is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Title Ix

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score15 analyzed articles50.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Confirm…9%Availab…8%Framing…22%
Alaska v. a Charter Plane and a Six-Pack of Beer3%
The Dispatch27%By Sarah Isgur0% David French0%7/23/2026, 7:00:00 AM
The Heritage Foundation Only Wanted to Protect Women’s Sports When It Was About Trans Athletes70%
Mother Jones49%By Madison Pauly0%7/22/2026, 10:00:00 AM
The Supreme Court says states may protect fair opportunity for women and girls59%
Washington Examiner73%By Connor Bolster57% Tom Jipping0%7/22/2026, 12:45:53 AM
The Supreme Court didn’t ban trans athletes. It handed CT a choice75%
CT Mirror17%By Taylor Edelmann0%7/17/2026, 4:01:00 AM
Is Title IX Holding Back U.S. Men's International Soccer?31%
Reason.com38%By Paul Cassell0%7/12/2026, 4:11:48 PM
The Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Trans Rights33%
Washington Monthly52%By Alison Gash0%7/3/2026, 9:00:00 AM
What does it mean to be an American? Ask a conservative. | Opinion73%
USA TODAY0%By Nicole Russell0%7/2/2026, 4:03:31 AM
How the SCOTUS trans athlete ruling affects WA20%
KUOW72%By Sarah Mizes-Tan40%6/30/2026, 10:21:29 PM
Supreme Court rules against trans girls participating in single-sex sports, but leaves open larger questions of trans rights10%
The Conversation0%By Marie-Amelie George0%6/30/2026, 8:58:38 PM
Democrats won’t learn from Supreme Court trans ruling53%
UnHerd72%By Lisa Selin Davis0%6/30/2026, 5:15:13 PM