Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Selin Davis results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 4,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,553 of 6,346 authors). This Lisa Selin Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Lisa Selin Davis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
76%Lisa Selin Davis (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,836
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.0%9.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.9%5.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos