Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Sarah Isgur results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 104 hits . Analysis detected 343 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,619 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Isgur is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sarah Isgur
Author details
Total words: 1,619
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst