Keyword summary
63% 12 analyzed articles/videos 1,127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peace Deal results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 2,113 hits . Analysis detected 20,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,240 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,725 of 37,349 keywords). This Peace Deal is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Peace Deal
Keyword details
Total words: 15,240
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score12 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst