Author summary
ā 100% 1 analyzed article/video 340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Batya Ungar-Sargon results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 58% saturation with 592 hits . Analysis detected 4,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of ā 97% (211 of 6,215 authors). This Batya Ungar-Sargon is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Batya Ungar-Sargon
Author details
Total words: 1,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.6% percentile 13.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0ā75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 57.8% 57.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 58.0% 58.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 46.8% 46.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 51.0% 51.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 26.6% 26.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 20.1% 20.1% Politically Right Leaning⦠Sitewide 1.4% Author 17.4% 17.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 14.4% 14.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 14.4% 14.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Hasty Generalization: Author 58.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 57.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 51.0%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 46.8%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Author 26.6%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 20.1%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.6%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 14.4%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 14.4%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 13.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst