Keyword summary
85% 10 analyzed articles/videos 2,622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obama results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 2,761 hits . Analysis detected 30,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,847 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (14,366 of 34,040 keywords). This Obama is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Obama
Keyword details
Total words: 17,847
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst