Keyword summary
62% 14 analyzed articles/videos 10,634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Atlantic Treaty Organization results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 5,898 hits . Analysis detected 38,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,422 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,651 of 37,536 keywords). This North Atlantic Treaty Organization is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Keyword details
Total words: 45,422
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score14 analyzed articles45.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst