Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claudia Ciobanu results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 853 hits . Analysis detected 5,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,719 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,437 of 6,360 authors). This Claudia Ciobanu is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Claudia Ciobanu
Author details
Total words: 7,719
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst