Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giada Zampano results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 384 hits . Analysis detected 2,508 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,461 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,135 of 6,170 authors). This Giada Zampano is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Giada Zampano
Author details
Total words: 3,461
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst