Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SAM McNEIL results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 1,023 hits. Analysis detected 8,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,136 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (1,993 of 6,607 authors). This SAM McNEIL is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
SAM McNEIL
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠70%SAM McNEIL (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,136
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510069.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.3%12.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.1%0.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos