Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These EMMA BURROWS results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 859 hits . Analysis detected 3,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,734 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,290 of 6,364 authors). This EMMA BURROWS is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. EMMA BURROWS
Author details
Total words: 7,734
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst