Keyword summary
71% 20 analyzed articles/videos 9,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Chiefs results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 4,767 hits . Analysis detected 42,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,134 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (28,070 of 34,797 keywords). This Kansas City Chiefs is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Kansas City Chiefs
Keyword details
Total words: 44,134
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score20 analyzed articles44.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst