OutKick89%

Trump presses Kansas City BBQ restaurant owner on whether Patrick Mahomes will start Week 1 of NFL season 38%

By Armando Salguero0%

5/5/2026, 10:01:24 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 959 faulty-reasoning hits from 527 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,633 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the article peer group.

The idea behind President Donald Trump hosting the owner of Slap's BBQ of Kansas City at the White House on Monday was to put attention on the Small Business Summit in Washington, but the sports-fan-in-chief quickly turned the conversation to his concern for Patrick Mahomes. 
"The most important thing, how's Mahomes doing?" 
Trump asked Slap's president Joe Pearce about the Kansas City Chiefs quarterback. 
"Is he OK?" 
"He's OK," Pearce said without hesitation, suggesting he really knows. 
"You tell the people we love him," Trump added. 
TRUMP PRAISES BRITTANY MAHOMES FOR 'STRONGLY DEFENDING' HIM ON SOCIAL MEDIA 
Of course he does. 
The Mahomes family, starting with the quarterback's mother Randi and his wife Brittany are known Trump supporters while brother Jackson at one point was thrilled to get a selfie with the president. 
Mahomes has avoided making a public endorsement for Trump but obviously the family's general inclination is not a secret. 
So, obviously, the president is hoping for good news on Mahomes, who is recovering from a torn ACL and LCL in his left knee, an injury he suffered last December as perhaps the biggest blow to the disappointing Chiefs 2025 season. 
But Trump wanted more than a general answer. 
He pressed Pearce further. 
CHIEFS DOCTOR REVEALS WHEN PATRICK MAHOMES IS EXPECTED TO RETURN TO THE FIELD 
"So, he'll start Game 1, you think?" 
Trump asked. 
Now, it should be noted that brothers Joe and Mike, who founded Slap's, are big dudes. 
So did the president think one of them was actually Chiefs coach Andy Reid? 
Joe and Mike know Baby Backs. 
But they don't know if Mahomes will be ready for the regular season or not. 
TRAVIS KELCE TALKS CRUSHING PATRICK MAHOMES SEASON-ENDING INJURY 
They tried anyway. 
"We're hopeful," the brothers said in unison. 
Great. 
The fact is there is actually some good news for Trump to chew on without it being served up by the BBQ guys. 
Over the weekend, Reid gave reporters a positive report on Mahomes. 
"Yeah, I know he’s doing a lot of stuff right now," Reid said. 
"That’s what I can give you. 
He is throwing the ball, and he does it on his own so he’s not getting in any trouble here." 
The Chiefs begin their Offseason Team Activities (OTAs) on May 26. 
Is it possible Mahomes, five months post-operative, might be able to participate in some of those? 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK SPORTS COVERAGE 
"We’ve got to see on that," Reid said. 
"He is in a good position to be able to do some things. 
There’s some rules and regulations that go with that. 
So, we just have to make sure we’re on top of that part, but if he can do some things, Phase Two remember, is there’s no contact, no offense versus defense." 
Mahomes has spent most days rehabilitating in the Chiefs' training facility. 
He's posted an Instagram video of himself taking drops although not at full speed. 
"He’s in a position where he can do everything I think," Reid said. 
FOLLOW ARMANDO SALGUERO ON X: @ARMANDOSALGUERO 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.1%Armando Salguero: 5.3%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Armando Salguero: 4.7%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic2.1%This article: 11.8%Armando Salguero: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic11.8%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Armando Salguero: 4.5%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias15.7%This article: 11.0%Armando Salguero: 10.5%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect11.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.8%Armando Salguero: 3.5%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias11.8%This article: 8.5%Armando Salguero: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias8.5%This article: 1.5%Armando Salguero: 14.7%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Armando Salguero: 2.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error7.8%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Armando Salguero: 3.3%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Armando Salguero: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Armando Salguero: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 2.1%Armando Salguero: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.2%Armando Salguero: 3.3%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority3.2%This article: 2.8%Armando Salguero: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma2.8%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.1%Armando Salguero: 10.6%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization6.1%This article: 4.4%Armando Salguero: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring4.4%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 2.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.8%Armando Salguero: 6.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion7.8%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.8%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.8%Armando Salguero: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.8%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.0%Armando Salguero: 3.1%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal7.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.1%Armando Salguero: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.1%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.0%Armando Salguero: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground3.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.4%Armando Salguero: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection3.4%This article: 40.2%Armando Salguero: 14.8%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice40.2%This article: 1.3%Armando Salguero: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination1.3%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Armando Salguero: 1.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Armando Salguero: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.5%

527 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers32%attributed speech359writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Pearce • 10 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJoe and Mike • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAndy Reid • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAndy Reid • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAndy Reid • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageAndy Reid • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAndy Reid • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAndy Reid • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAndy Reid • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAndy Reid • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Joe Pearce

100%flagged-word coverage
10 attributed words6.0% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+47.4 ptsWriter: 52.6%Joe Pearce: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Joe Pearce: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Joe Pearce: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.