Topic summary
⁠89%4 analyzed articles/videos1,675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Chiefs results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 1,142 hits. Analysis detected 9,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,020 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,608 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas City Chiefs is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Kansas City Chiefs
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
4.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.8%20.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.8%22.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos