Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophia Flores (OAN Staff) results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 923 hits . Analysis detected 5,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,201 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 93% (446 of 6,224 authors). This Sophia Flores (OAN Staff) is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group. Sophia Flores (OAN Staff)
Author details
Total words: 2,201
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.8% percentile 8.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 23.8% 23.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 22.9% 22.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 41.9% 41.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 19.9% 19.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 26.0% 26.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 14.4% 14.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.6% 15.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 11.0% 11.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 41.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 26.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 23.8%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 22.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 19.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.6%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst