Topic summary
ā 0%2 analyzed articles/videos924 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Mahomes results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 790 hits. Analysis detected 5,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,772 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ā 76% (4,106 of 16,562 topics). This Patrick Mahomes is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Patrick Mahomes
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 76%Patrick Mahomes (selected)5%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,772
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.9%17.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.5%28.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.3%6.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.4%22.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos