Keyword summary
53% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hiv Aids results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,756 hits . Analysis detected 18,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,330 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,342 of 35,635 keywords). This Hiv Aids is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Hiv Aids
Keyword details
Total words: 21,330
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst