Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabrielle Emanuel results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 2,737 hits . Analysis detected 15,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,191 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,569 of 6,263 authors). This Gabrielle Emanuel is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Gabrielle Emanuel
Author details
Total words: 18,191
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.1% 15.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst