Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Lambert results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,428 hits . Analysis detected 7,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,818 of 6,362 authors). This Jonathan Lambert is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Jonathan Lambert
Author details
Total words: 8,520
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.5%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst