Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatma Tanis results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 2,117 hits . Analysis detected 13,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,436 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,228 of 6,628 authors). This Fatma Tanis is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Fatma Tanis
Author details
Total words: 17,436
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst