BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 4,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,631 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,597 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the article peer group.

This has been the year of Heated Rivalry. 
The gay hockey drama rocketed from Canadian obscurity to become an international sensation. 
It is now the most-watched non-animated show on HBO Max since the streamer launched in 2020, and its two leads, Connor Storie and Hudson Williams, are inescapable presences on every kind of media platform and red carpet. 
Heated Rivalry marked a milestone for queer representation, inspiring NHL commissioner Gary Bettman to binge the series, as well as current players to come out publicly. 
It got straight men watching a gay hockey soap opera and provided people with fresh opportunities for rekindling family relationships. 
“We’re living in the glow of access to HIV prevention and treatments, which have allowed a new generation not only to survive, but to speak about sex and culture and history in a way that we weren’t able to before,” writer and artist Leo Herrera told me. 
It would thus be easy to judge this moment uncritically, as another sign that society largely recognizes LGBTQIA+ people and mainstream culture frequently celebrates queer life. 
The hottest show in America is a mega-steamy gay romance—who would have thought that sentence would ever be written? 
But turn off the television and a markedly different reality intrudes—one in which queer people find their very existence under threat in ways not seen for generations. 
To be queer right now is to experience this dissonance over and over again. 
These contradictions are evident in how Heated Rivalry is lauded while GLAAD records queer characters being cut elsewhere in television; how cruising apps Grindr and Sniffies are widely known but access to LGBTQ+ healthcare is being stripped and the US Supreme Court upholds the legality of conversion therapy; how Pride events are now large parties with growing attendance by straight people while corporate sponsors took a step back in recent years; how sports restrictions against trans athletes are spreading despite GLAAD finding “zero complaints” about trans participation for more than a decade; how drag brunches and queer book readings are enjoyed as bomb threats or protests gather outside; how there is high support for same-sex marriage amid concerns of the Obergefell decision being revisited in the Supreme Court; and how transgender visibility has increased but the lives of trans people are lethally at risk. 
We’ve lived through discordant periods like this in the past. 
Before Heated Rivalry, there was Tom Hanks in Philadelphia taking place through the AIDS crisis, and Will and Grace airing at the same time as battles over the decriminalization of sodomy and same-sex marriage. 
But even so, the gap between what we watch and what queer people experience in real life feels particularly acute right now. 
The Human Rights Campaign in 2023 issued a “state of emergency for LGBTQ+ people” in the US for the first time in its history. 
The number of anti-LGBTQ+ bills introduced across state legislatures—on bathroom use, book bans, healthcare access, and more—has broken records year on year since 2023, according to data by the American Civil Liberties Union. 2025 marked six consecutive years of broken records in the amount of total anti-trans bills introduced in the US, according to the Trans Legislation Tracker, with more than 740 anti-trans bills being considered just three months into 2026. 
In March, Kansas revoked the driver’s licenses of 1,700 transgender people in the state. 
The juxtaposition between the mainstream acknowledgement of the LGBTQIA+ community and the fight for queer protections can be exemplified in a theoretical pendulum, Herrera argued. 
“You have to get used to the pendulum of your acceptance and the threats of patriarchy or government crackdowns on homosexuality, queerness or transgender rights,” he said. 
“That’s always been with us, always.” 
“When hot men are on screen, people are gonna respond,” transgender writer and consultant Maybe Burke told me. 
“It’s why Grindr crashes at [Republican National Committee] events, you know? 
It’s why we see people looking for trans women on dating apps, and also voting against our rights constantly. 
There’s this dichotomy of us being desirable or entertaining, or whatever word I want to be filling that blank with  but not being considered fully human.” 
While conservatives cruise on Grindr, as confirmed by its CEO George Arison in an UnHerd interview last July, queer healthcare is suffering. 
Arison pointed to policies under President Donald Trump’s administration resulting in “awful” cuts to PEPFAR, a longtime global program to address AIDS in more than 50 countries, and “really bad” changes in the country’s HIV response that is now limiting treatments and care. 
The current moment also comes as the Supreme Court has veered sharply right, along with the rest of the federal judiciary. 
“What’s alarming now is…there are literally dozens of cases that are percolating within the courts,” <em>Law Dork </em>journalist Chris Geidner said. 
“We have cases that are at the appellate level relating to the ban on transgender people in the military, we have the passport case [on identification], we have cases on efforts to ban federal grants mainly for organizations that do trans work.” 
Some observers are raising even bigger alarms. 
Two former presidents of the International Association of Genocide Scholars, including one currently heading Genocide Watch, told Important Context in January there are attempts “to destroy a gender group”, or “genocide against trans people” in the US “in the near future.” 
The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention’s executive director Dr Elisa von Joeden-Forgey told Important Context that the US is in the “early-to-mid stages of a genocidal process against trans and nonbinary and intersex people.” 
The non-governmental organization has issued three “red flag” alerts over the Trump administration’s anti-trans actions. 
For Burke, these trends show the limitations of the kind of representation discourse that has surrounded Heated Rivalry. 
“Tiq Milan has a quote in the Disclosure documentary that Laverne Cox on Netflix produced where he says, ‘the more we are seen, the more we are violated,’ and that has stuck with me,” Burke said. 
“If we can be celebrated in the media, then [it’s easy to assume that] there’s no way that there’s a trans genocide going on, but that’s not true.” 
“What happens is people get very caught up in the Heated Rivalry of it all, and they’re not really paying attention to the loss of our rights and the loss of our medical access,” Herrera said. 
He also noted that the Canadian drama was palatable to a broad audience, given that it featured masculine-presenting athletes in a monogamous-oriented story that revolves around the closet and doesn’t mention disease. 
Still, even if the success of Heated Rivalry doesn’t mean we’re in a queer utopia, it does signal that millions of ordinary people are uninterested in the current wave of anti-queer hatred. 
“You’ve got an effort to push one culture from the people who are in charge of a lot of key institutions, but that’s not actually the cultural moment that people want,” Geidner said. 
“These are nothing more than attempts to create differences and create exclusionary policies so that further exclusionary policies can be justified, and it has never worked, and it will not work.” 
Black transgender attorney Kylar Broadus, founder of the Trans People of Color Coalition, agrees. 
“While we see this big pushback in trying to put us all back into a package or can of 19… whatever, that’s not going to happen because society has already surpassed that,” he said. 
“We’re past that.” 
There is some evidence to back that up: A record high 41% of Americans know someone who is transgender, according to a SRSS study, and 85% said trans people should have the same rights and protections as everyone else. 68% of people in the US support same-sex marriage over 10 years after it became legalized, Gallup found. 
And a majority of Americans in a Pew Research Center survey said trans people should be protected from discrimination. 
“It's really important to stay as calm as we can in these moments; otherwise we make decisions out of fear, or we make decisions out of complacency because we see ourselves on TV, we think that we aren’t going to be threatened, our access to PrEP won’t be threatened, and our marriage won’t be overturned,” Herrera said about community members. 
“It's always about being alert, but also very appreciative of all the things that we've been able to accomplish, and our ancestors accomplished.” 
Broadus, who said he has seen in speaking engagements how “it’s really depressing now” for the current generation, emphasized perspective. 
“While we have a long way to go, we have come a long way,” he shared. 
“There was no trans visibility in my era, or any elders, and the elders that I saw were few and far, and they didn’t have a good life at all.” 
In the years since, Broadus advocated for the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr Hate Crimes Act, and he was the first openly transgender American to testify before the US Senate on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which he was recognized for by former President Barack Obama. 
“I’ve had to live where I couldn’t go outside, literally, so I have to not make it the  focus of my life on a daily basis,” he said. 
Art and popular culture can humanize oppressed people, and that’s prevalent with the introduction of Heated Rivalry amid anti-queer policies today. 
“It’s almost like everybody forgets we’re human, and we contain multitudes,” Herrera added. 
“And then all of a sudden, it occurs to everybody all at once that queer people like romance, that queer people have healthy sex, that queer people create art, and we go through that once about every ten years.” 
And for Broadus, it comes down to this point: “We’re no different than anyone else; we just want to live our lives.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.7%Patrick deHahn: 4.4%The Nation: 5.4%Confirmation Bias15.7%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Patrick deHahn: 3.7%The Nation: 2.9%Availability Heuristic10.9%This article: 5.6%Patrick deHahn: 1.4%The Nation: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.6%This article: 0.6%Patrick deHahn: 0.2%The Nation: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.6%This article: 2.8%Patrick deHahn: 2.0%The Nation: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias2.8%This article: 10.5%Patrick deHahn: 4.4%The Nation: 6.9%Framing Effect10.5%This article: 5.5%Patrick deHahn: 1.4%The Nation: 0.5%Loss Aversion5.5%This article: 0.4%Patrick deHahn: 0.1%The Nation: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.4%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.5%Patrick deHahn: 5.0%The Nation: 2.0%Optimism Bias12.5%This article: 4.8%Patrick deHahn: 1.2%The Nation: 1.8%Pessimism Bias4.8%This article: 22.4%Patrick deHahn: 13.5%The Nation: 11.0%Negativity Bias22.4%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Patrick deHahn: 0.6%The Nation: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error2.2%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Patrick deHahn: 1.3%The Nation: 2.5%In-Group Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Patrick deHahn: 2.7%The Nation: 1.8%Halo Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%Patrick deHahn: 1.8%The Nation: 1.0%Recency Bias5.4%This article: 1.4%Patrick deHahn: 0.4%The Nation: 0.6%Primacy Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 3.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.4%The Nation: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.7%Patrick deHahn: 5.5%The Nation: 3.4%Appeal to Authority12.7%This article: 10.0%Patrick deHahn: 6.5%The Nation: 2.4%False Dilemma10.0%This article: 4.1%Patrick deHahn: 1.5%The Nation: 1.7%Slippery Slope4.1%This article: 1.9%Patrick deHahn: 0.5%The Nation: 0.1%Circular Reasoning1.9%This article: 22.6%Patrick deHahn: 8.6%The Nation: 8.6%Hasty Generalization22.6%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.7%Patrick deHahn: 1.4%The Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon5.7%This article: 12.2%Patrick deHahn: 3.4%The Nation: 7.5%Appeal to Emotion12.2%This article: 1.7%Patrick deHahn: 0.4%The Nation: 1.4%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 9.1%Patrick deHahn: 2.3%The Nation: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.6%Patrick deHahn: 1.1%The Nation: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.6%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 10.1%Patrick deHahn: 2.5%The Nation: 0.6%Composition/Division10.1%This article: 14.7%Patrick deHahn: 4.4%The Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal14.7%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.1%Patrick deHahn: 2.0%The Nation: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 1.3%Patrick deHahn: 0.3%The Nation: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy1.3%This article: 0.4%Patrick deHahn: 0.1%The Nation: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.4%This article: 2.5%Patrick deHahn: 1.3%The Nation: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.5%This article: 12.2%Patrick deHahn: 3.4%The Nation: 16.5%Biased Writer Voice12.2%This article: 5.1%Patrick deHahn: 1.3%The Nation: 4.4%Indoctrination5.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.6%The Nation: 9.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick deHahn: 0.0%The Nation: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1631 words analyzed.

Speakers

12speakers62%attributed speech613writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageLeo Herrera • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 144 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageHuman Rights Campaign • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAmerican Civil Liberties Union • 71 words • 0.0% coverageKansas • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageLeo Herrera • 27 words • 0.0% coverageLeo Herrera • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMaybe Burke • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMaybe Burke • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMaybe Burke • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMaybe Burke • 27 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 22 words • 100.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageChris Geidner • 21 words • 0.0% coverageChris Geidner • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageInternational Association of Genocide Scholars • 41 words • 0.0% coverageDr Elisa von Joeden-Forgey • 34 words • 0.0% coverageLemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMaybe Burke • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMaybe Burke • 36 words • 0.0% coverageMaybe Burke • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLeo Herrera • 36 words • 0.0% coverageLeo Herrera • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageChris Geidner • 33 words • 0.0% coverageChris Geidner • 31 words • 0.0% coverageKylar Broadus • 14 words • 0.0% coverageKylar Broadus • 34 words • 0.0% coverageKylar Broadus • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 57 words • 0.0% coveragePew Research Center • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLeo Herrera • 60 words • 100.0% coverageLeo Herrera • 23 words • 100.0% coverageKylar Broadus • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKylar Broadus • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKylar Broadus • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageKylar Broadus • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLeo Herrera • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLeo Herrera • 39 words • 0.0% coverageKylar Broadus • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words4.0% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-32.5 ptsWriter: 32.5%International Association of Genocide Scholars: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%International Association of Genocide Scholars: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%International Association of Genocide Scholars: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.