Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Association of Genocide Scholars results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Quote-first Misdirection, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 164 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,928 of 28,364 speakers). This International Association of Genocide Scholars is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
International Association of Genocide Scholars
Speaker details
Total words: 41
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos41 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos