Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Media Representation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 878 hits. Analysis detected 5,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,868 of 16,562 topics). This Media Representation is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Media Representation
Topic details
Total words: 6,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos