Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pep Far results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , False Dilemma , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 878 hits . Analysis detected 5,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,932 of 37,536 keywords). This Pep Far is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Pep Far
Keyword details
Total words: 6,524
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst