Author summary
31% 1 analyzed article/video 1,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fiza Kuzhiyil results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 289 hits . Analysis detected 2,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,149 of 6,360 authors). This Fiza Kuzhiyil is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Fiza Kuzhiyil
Author details
Total words: 4,116
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst