Keyword summary
40% 40 analyzed articles/videos 21,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Safety results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 6,763 hits . Analysis detected 72,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 100,454 analyzed words across 40 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,650 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Safety is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group. Food Safety
Keyword details
Total words: 100,454
Article count: 40
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score40 analyzed articles100.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst