Keyword summary
64% 15 analyzed articles/videos 18,339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cesar Chavez results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 5,529 hits . Analysis detected 62,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,584 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (29,907 of 35,112 keywords). This Cesar Chavez is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Cesar Chavez
Keyword details
Total words: 69,584
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score15 analyzed articles69.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst