Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Sequeira results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 1,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,677 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (5,013 of 6,244 authors). This Kate Sequeira is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Kate Sequeira
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠20%Kate Sequeira (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,677
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Tu Quoque: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Red Herring: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos