Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gustavo Arellano results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 253 hits . Analysis detected 2,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,149 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,320 of 6,628 authors). This Gustavo Arellano is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Gustavo Arellano
Author details
Total words: 5,149
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst