BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 81.4% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 322 faulty-reasoning hits from 118 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.4% and a BS Rank of 8% (20,236 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the article peer group.

Gustavo Arellano is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, covering Southern California everything and a bunch of the West and beyond. 
He was a finalist for the 2025 Pulitzer Prize in Commentary and the Mike Royko Award for Commentary and Column Writing and was part of the team that won the 2023 Pulitzer Prize in Breaking News. 
Arellano previously worked at OC Weekly, where he was an investigative reporter for 15 years and editor for six, wrote a column called ¡Ask a Mexican! 
and is the author of “Taco USA: How Mexican Food Conquered America.” 
He’s the child of two Mexican immigrants, one of whom came to this country in the trunk of a Chevy. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Gustavo Arellano: 3.9%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect10.2%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Gustavo Arellano: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias16.9%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Gustavo Arellano: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias16.9%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 81.4%Gustavo Arellano: 3.7%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect81.4%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 18.6%Gustavo Arellano: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect18.6%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 30.5%Gustavo Arellano: 3.5%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority30.5%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 27.1%Gustavo Arellano: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion27.1%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.9%Gustavo Arellano: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal16.9%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.6%Gustavo Arellano: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.6%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 35.6%Gustavo Arellano: 4.4%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice35.6%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 4.9%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

118 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.7%attributed speech116writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Gustavo Arellano • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Gustavo Arellano

0%flagged-word coverage
2 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-36.2 ptsWriter: 36.2%Gustavo Arellano: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.