Author summary
84% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,034 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farida Jhabvala Romero results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 2,794 hits . Analysis detected 19,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,875 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,225 of 6,364 authors). This Farida Jhabvala Romero is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Farida Jhabvala Romero
Author details
Total words: 15,875
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst