Author summary
21% 2 analyzed articles/videos 635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Hussein results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and In-Group Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 281 hits . Analysis detected 1,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,191 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,428 of 6,359 authors). This Sara Hussein is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Sara Hussein
Author details
Total words: 4,191
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst