Keyword summary
62% 48 analyzed articles/videos 26,445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animals results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 9,149 hits . Analysis detected 97,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 124,843 analyzed words across 47 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (32,237 of 34,588 keywords). This Animals is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Animals
Keyword details
Total words: 124,843
Article count: 47
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score47 analyzed articles124.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst