Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brooklyn Jamerson-Flowers results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 301 hits . Analysis detected 2,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,564 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,195 of 6,316 authors). This Brooklyn Jamerson-Flowers is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Brooklyn Jamerson-Flowers
Author details
Total words: 3,564
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst