Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 8,302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Howie results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 3,096 hits . Analysis detected 29,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,245 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,146 of 6,135 authors). This Stephen Howie is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Stephen Howie
Author details
Total words: 35,245
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score12 analyzed articles35.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst